Our double-anonymous peer review process ensures objectivity, as authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other. We follow a rigorous review system to uphold the quality, credibility, and originality of published research.

Each submitted manuscript undergoes an initial editorial screening to check for compliance with ethical standards and manuscript preparation guidelines. If suitable, the manuscript proceeds to peer review, where a minimum of two independent experts evaluate its coherence and structure, methodology and findings, originality, comprehensiveness, and relevance to current literature.

Authors are required to revise their work based on reviewer feedback before final acceptance. Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining scholarly standards, and we encourage them to refer to our Reviewer’s Guide for detailed instructions. This structured process ensures the integrity of academic publishing and contributes to the advancement of knowledge.